Ross Wilson's Woody Allen
Woody Allen's latest movie, Vicky Cristina Barcelona, is a paradox. It won Penelope Cruz an Oscar but has garnered some thumpingly bad reviews.
I watched it this afternoon and was sporadically baffled and entertained. The story of two young American women (Vicky and Cristina) coming to Barcelona for a summer is an extended advertisement for the Catalan tourist industry. They wander around beautiful churches, buy local delicacies, have a bit of romantic confusion with a passionate artist, but do very little that constitutes a plot. It's charming somnambulism.
Then Penelope arrives as the artist's certifiably unhinged ex-wife. She's brilliant - she jolts the audience awake with a volcanic performance which is funny, shocking, fresh and, above all, alive.
I'm not giving anything away by saying that none of the elements in the slender story is resolved. The footloose character stays footloose, the staid one opts to stay staid, the unhappy wife stands by her man, and the separated couple stay... you've guessed it.
I normally love films which make gratuitous use of voiceovers. Remember Goodfellas' pre-title line? "As far back as I can remember, I always wanted to be a gangster."
But Woody's flick ends with downbeat commentary that constitutes, literally, an anticlimax:
Vicky went home to have her grand wedding to Doug to the house they both finally settled on, and to lead the life she had envisioned for herself before the summer in Barcelona. Cristina continued searching, certain only of what she didn't want.
I left the cinema with John Patterson's damning critique of Woody's recent career ringing in my ears. He argues that the Americans realised he had run dry and kicked him off their shores long ago. Since then he's been on a trawl across Europe with Scarlett Johansson in tow wooing financiers.
And it's true that VCB doesn't have the creativity of Annie Hall, the insight of Manhattan or the empathy of Hannah and Her Sisters (not to mention the jokes of Bullets Over Broadway, the drama of Crimes and Misdemeanors, the bonkers brilliance of Love and Death or the acerbic bite of Deconstructing Harry).
But look back at that voiceover quote. Whoever's speaking is doing so from a vantage point far in the future. The one thing that can be said about VCB is that this is a film of the "now". You can't get a more contemporary cast than S Johannson, Rebecca Hall, Javier Bardem and P Cruz. But the fog of mortality hangs over this picture and, by extension, us.

The film's travelogue moments and romantic couplings appear meaningless because in Woody's worldview such distractions are meaningless. As Koheleth, the writer of Ecclesiastes, might say: "There’s nothing to anything - it’s all smoke." The ageing filmmaker has no desire to give examples of Aristotlean individual redemption because he doesn't believe in it. There is nothing new under the Catalan sun and Woody is not about to shine false hope in anyone's eyes. The characters go to see a giant crucifix which the artist loves as a "statue", but there is no suggestion any God-shaped hole can be filled.
My friend Joel Wilson believes Woody's personal philosophy boils down to an existentialist belief that life is defined by the shadow of death and you had better pursue individual happiness, such as romantic love, even if you need to destroy your world in order to grasp it.
Nothing happens in VCB because the characters don't have the courage - according to such a view - to overturn their existences and pursue individual fulfilment. Is Woody saying that the existentialist project has run out of steam and we are just waiting for the final reel to come to an end? Is this deliberately superficial film actually one of his most radical? If it is, it shows he has never abandoned his wrestle with the question of the meaning of life.
And if he is still focused on this ancient question, then it is fair to close with a contribution from one of the greatest thinkers on this subject. Over to you, Karl Barth:
If a man believes and knows God, he can no longer ask, What is the meaning of my life? But by believing he actually lives the meaning of his life, the meaning of his creaturliness, of his individuality, in the limits of his creaturliness and individuality and in the fallibility of his existence, in the sin in which he is involved and of which daily and hourly imparted to him through God's interceding for him, in spite of him and without his deserving it.
He recognizes the task assigned to him in this whole, and the hope vouchsafed to him in and with this task, because of the grace by which he may live and the praise of the glory promised him, by which he is even here and now secretly surrounded in all lowliness. The believer confesses this meaning of his existence.
The Christian Creed speaks of God as the ground and goal of all that exists. The ground and goal of the entire cosmos means Jesus Christ. And the unheard-of thing may and must be said, that where Christian faith exists, there also exists, through God's being trusted, inmost familiarity with the ground and goal of all that happens, of all things; there man lives, in spite of all that is said to the contrary, in the peace that passeth all understanding, and which for that very reason is the light that lightens our understanding."(Dogmatics in Outline, p.26-7)







